Since I've cornered
the market in the bubble-bursting department, I might as well sharpen my
ice-pick and address the very important/not at all important issue of writing
dialogue.
In my previous
rants, I've committed the heresy of putting forward the humble proposition that
you must have talent to write a good screenplay (operative words there,
"talent" and "good.")
An example of this
is the writing of dialogue.
Having an ear for
dialogue is analagous to having natural rhythm. Either you can dance, or you
can't dance. You can't "learn" how to write good dialogue any
more than you can "learn" to tap your toe in beat with a song. It's
either comes naturally, or it doesn't come at all.
Sure, even if you're
a spaz on the dance floor, it's possible to sit down, one eye on a metronome,
and, after hours of patient practice, learn to tap your foot along with one
song. But you're screwed the moment the next tune comes up.
It's like the drunk
who steps up to the bar. "Iwannashnwad," he says. The bartender
refuses, "Listen up, pal, if you're too blotto to order the cocktail,
you're too blotto to drink it.
The drunk staggers
outside, stands in an alley for an hour and practices. "I wannashodgenwad.
I wanna shcodgenwad. I wanna scotchenwadder..."
He goes back into
the bar, orders his drink. A regular Laurence Olivier: "I want a scotch
and water."
The bartender gives
him a look, says, "You want that straight-up or on the rocks?"
The drunk thinks
about it.
"Iwannashnwad,"
he says.
I guess that what
I'm getting at is you can "learn" to craft one good line.
Unfortunately a piece of dramatic writing usually has a shitload of good lines,
all coming from different characters, with different backgrounds and different
ways of speaking.
If you can't
"hear" what they're saying naturally—automatically—and you have to
intellectually ponder each and every line, you're not just at a
disadvantage.
You're totally
screwed.
If you do
have an ear for dialogue, congratulations. But that's just an admission ticket
to hone your talent. Knowing how "real people talk" is handy, but it
doesn't have a whole lot to do with written dialogue. Just listen to those two
“real people” in the next booth at Denny's.
NO! Not them,
numbnuts! The other booth. Listen...
REAL PERSON #1
So I go down to the Sears an'...
(takes a big bite of
French toast)...
So I go down to the Sears an'...
(takes a big bite of
French toast)...
mish guy, ya know—
REAL PERSON #2
Which guy?
REAL PERSON #1
The guy, you know. That one with the
eye.
REAL PERSON #2
Oh yeah. I know that guy. Ricky somethin,
right? He's a dick.
REAL PERSON #1
Fuggin-A. So I'm standing there, waiting,
and, like, there's this music, you
know,
like playing. You know that song...
(sings)
(sings)
Dee-deet-du-dee-dee-dee—
REAL PERSON #2
They always play that in there! I was
there, shit, I dunno, I was there
and
they were playin that then, too. I swear
to God. It's like, what do they
got? One
tape? Jeez...
Had enough?
Sure, it sounds
"real." That's the way real people talk. The only problem is that real
people don't say anything!
Then there's the
other end of the spectrum: Characters who say exactly what they are
thinking or feeling at any given time. Just turn on the television. It's like a
pox.
JOHN
You're empty inside, Debra. You're
incapable of love.
DEBRA
That's not true, John. I do love you.
I do! But you're too blind
to see it.
It's not easy to open up to a man after
you've been repeatedly
sodomized by a
satanic cult of outlaw bikers!
(sobs)
But I'm trying, John. You must know that!
JOHN
I do, Debra. I do! But a man has needs.
Can't you see this is tearing me apart?!
OH MY GOD!!! Stop!
My head's about to implode!
People are simply
a.) not that self-aware and b.) even if they were, they don't just blurt out
their deepest feelings, darkest secrets and greatest fears. Except, of
course, in hack screenplays.
(Oh, and by the
way? The only place where John calls Debra “Debra” and Debra calls John
“John” in every other line is on bad television. In real life, we rarely use a friend’s name
while speaking to him in a conversation.)
The Button is a BIG
LINE that one character says at the close of a scene that is so powerful— so
absolutely right—that it leaves the other character(s) speechless.
DEBRA
Tearing you apart. You, John. That's
what this relationship is
all about,
isn't it? That's what it's always been
about! YOU!!!
John stares at her, the bitter truth of her words sinking in. She coolly
regards him, then turns and exits.
When was the last
time an argument ever ended that way for you?
As for me, I've
dropped some absolute atom-bombs on
my wife in the course of arguments, yet none of them have ever rendered
her speechless. Why? Because she has her
own thermonuclear arsenal. Everyone does. The truth is, in real life, John
would look at Debra and say:
JOHN
Really? You really think so? Well,
you wanna know what I think? I think
you liked being sodomized by those
outlaw bikers!
It's called Mutual
Assured Destruction.
If you really want
to see how people behave in a toxic relationship, check out WHO'S AFRAID OF
VIRGINIA WOOLF? Burton and Taylor are like a binary star system, each locked in
orbit, feeding on each other in this beautiful, ghastly, absolutely brilliant
death-dance. You can't take your eyes off it.
Of course, we can't
all be Edward Albee. But we don't have to be hacks, either. And believe me, using
"THE BUTTON" is a hallmark of hack-writing. In real life, human
beings simply do not relate to each other this way.
Ever.
And they shouldn't
in your scripts, either. So next time you write a nice, pat little scene that deftly steps down to a pithy little button, do yourself a favor and write the next line. Because, as in the JOHN and DEBRA example above, that's where things will begin to come alive and get interesting.
Characters are a bit like dogs. You can snap the leash and make them heel or cut them loose and watch them run down rabbits. The former may be nice and safe and satisfying to the person walking the dog, but the latter is far more entertaining for the rest of us.